R&A EXPLAIN why Bryson DeChambeau has been handed a two-shot penalty!

R&A EXPLAIN why Bryson DeChambeau has been handed a two-shot penalty!



► Subscribe to Sky Sports Golf: https://bit.ly/SubscribeSkySportsGolf
► Watch Sky Sports with NOW: https://bit.ly/NOWGolfYT

Grant Moir, R&A referee, explains why Bryson DeChambeau was handed a two-shot penalty.

#open #dechambeau #golf

► Golf highlights: https://bit.ly/SkyGolfHighlights
► Sky Golf live streams: https://bit.ly/SkyGolfLive
► Sky Sports Golf Podcast: https://bit.ly/SkySportsGolfPodcast
► Audi Performance Zone: https://bit.ly/AudiPerformanceZone

More from Sky Sports on YouTube:

► Sky Sports: http://bit.ly/SkySportsSub
► Sky Sports Boxing: http://bit.ly/SSBoxingSub
► Sky Sports Cricket: http://bit.ly/SubscribeSkyCricket
► Sky Sports Darts: https://bit.ly/SubSkySportsDarts
► Sky Sports Football: http://bit.ly/SSFootballSub
► Sky Sports F1: http://bit.ly/SubscribeSkyF1
► Sky Sports News: http://bit.ly/SkySportsNewsSub
► Sky Sports Premier League: https://bit.ly/SubscribeSkySportsPL
► Sky Sports Retro: http://bit.ly/SkySportsRetroSub
► Sky Sports WSL: https://bit.ly/SubscribeSkySportsWSL

► Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SkySportsGolf
► Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/skysportsgolf/
► X: https://x.com/SkySportsGolf
►Website: https://www.skysports.com

► To enquire about licensing Sky Sports content, you can find out more here: https://www.skysports.com/more-sports/news/31754/11434270/license-sky-sports-footage

View Comments (36)
  1. Think it was harsh, however he did stamp down grass just as he arrived but it's unclear if that was close enough to the ball to be an issue. Because we can only see one angle, unlike with VAR, I would've given the player the benefit. And when you see his actual backswing it is clear of the grass. So I understand why he was penalised but I thought it was harsh.

  2. Well done to the R&A. De Chambeau has no respect for the game and its rules. Thankfully, the R&A stood form and put this arrogant sod in his place. Inadvertent, yeah right.

  3. Andrew Cotter on comms keeps saying Bryson got that penalty for unintentionaly improving his lie. This is incorrect. He got the penalty for improving his area of intended swing regardless of whether he did it deliberately or not. The ruling isn't concerned whatsoever about his intent. It so happens that the rules chap explaining the decision throws Bryson a bone by calling it inadvertent – he didn't need to do that at all. We can all have our opinion as to whether he was deliberately cheating or not but it's incorrect to keep saying that he got the penalty for unintentionally improving his lie.

  4. JFC I'm a casual golfer and I thought he was fugking off way too much around his ball in that grass. Also, golf faster in general. Dude takes forever.

  5. ITS NOT A FRIGGIN ADVANTAGE IF EVERY OTHER PLAYER DOES THE SAME THING MOVING THROUGH THE GRASS TO ADDRESS YOUR SHOT, BUT IF YOUR A CONSERVATIVE AMERICAN FROM LIV GOLF (((( YOU ARE PENALIZED ! ! ! ))) BY SOME REAL HATEFUL EVIL PRICKS WHO HAVE A LINE OF BULLCRAP READY FROM THEIR GROUP MEETINGS WHILE YOUR PLAYING YOUR REMAINING HOLES ( 13 HOLES ) WHICH WAS APPLIED GOING ALL THE WAY BACK TO HOLE NUMBER 5 RIGHT AFTER YOU FINISHED HOLE 18

  6. Good explanation… I think we're all better for this incident.

    If Bryson did a practice backswing and knocked down the grass… Is that "reasonable " Or also an "Unintended improvement"?

  7. You can just tell that lady in the middle already hates bryson. It would not have been a simple "fair enough" if it were Rory. Literally looks like she has tea with R&A officials

  8. BASICALLY YOU HAVE TO FLY INTO YOUR SHOT WITH A PAIR OF FAIRY WINGS AND HOVER AND SWING BETWEEN THE GRASS BLADES, BECAUSE (((( ANY )))) STEPPING BEHIND YOUR BALL IMPROVES THE STROKE, YOU GOT TO HAVE SOME SMALL FEET TO FIT BETWEEN THE BLADES OF GRASS AT WHERE THEY ENTER THE DIRT AND IF YOU USE YOUR CLUB IN A SWING AND HIT ANY DEBRI TWIGS, GRASS, PRIOR TO THE BALL THEN THIS IN THE SAME 8.1 RULE EQUALS = IMPROVING YOUR STROKE

  9. He didn’t do nothing wrong ,it was what everyone else would do ,you have the right 360% around the ball to determine one’s geometry or path to the hole.Bad call folks.

  10. Clearly the tall grass area directly behind Bryson's backswing and downswing was trampled down. Rules are rules. Bryson knew exactly what he did.

  11. Wondering what happens if 1. His caddy had walked behind the ball looking for it or2 all the people who sometimes tramp around helping players look for a ball somehow improve the players lie….who is responsible …is there a penalty. Not too difficult for a caddy to find a ball with his eyes and then act like he is still looking, tramp down a bunch of grass and then go " I found it be careful where you walk".

  12. Great decision upholding the integrity of the game. Just hope the same can apply to the football now, and bookings are given to those rolling around on the floor having never been touched.

  13. Anyone who actually plays golf, can see that’s a penalty. The only question mark dips if it was accidental. For an experienced pro it is either deliberate or unbelievably careless, if that had been Patrick Reed, people would’ve been all over it.

  14. If the guy had to read through a written statement instead of explaining it from his head tells me that it was a reach and they are trying to come up with a legalese language

  15. Their explanation was terrible. Why don't they just say he stomped down the grass that was in his backswing. That is what it looked like to me.

  16. Wonder if the R&A has a secret video that proves that the weeds he stepped on trying to addtess his ball were directly on his swing path. The videos I see are face on and don't appear to be in a direct line to the way he stood to hit the shot. Like Rory, Faldo and Brandel, I don't much care for Bryson, but we should be fair. What if they had a camera zoom in every time Rory marks his ball? What are the odds he would remark it EXACTLY within a millionth of an inch where it originally was? No way could it be done.

Leave a Reply