I Tested TaylorMade’s Old M2 vs Ping G430 — The Results Shocked Me

I Tested TaylorMade’s Old M2 vs Ping G430 — The Results Shocked Me



Why is Brooks Koepka still using a nearly decade-old fairway wood on the PGA Tour? In this video I put the TaylorMade M2 High Launch 3wood up against the most POPULAR 3 wood from 2025 – the Ping G430 Max – to find out whether new technology is actually better — or just different.

With help from scratch golfer Ben Campbell, we hit 20 shots with each club and analysed:

• Ball speed
• Spin rates
• Carry distance
• Peak height
• Descent angle
• Real on-course performance

The results explain exactly why some tour players — even after leaving LIV Golf — refuse to change equipment.

Thanks to Nearly New Golf Clubs for supplying the club for testing;

CLICK HERE – https://nearlynewgolfclubs.co.uk/

📊 This is a fully data-driven comparison — no marketing, just numbers.

If you enjoy honest golf equipment testing that helps you shoot lower scores, subscribe to TK Golf and join the journey.

As always, I’m using the Flightscope Mevo Plus to gather all of my data here in my Home Golf Simulator!

👉 THIS is the BIGGEST Golf Ball Test I have EVER done; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_BlQ0OxdaY&list=PLs_FPcL40bMhIWRehE1XagNPXotgbSUEV

👉 BEFORE You Buy Your Next Box of Golf Balls, UNDERSTAND THIS; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uierD3GPr6E&t=436s

Make sure you hit the SUBSCRIBE button so you don’t miss out on the next data driven golf product review and game imprvement ideas! Comment to get involved witht he community so we can all get better at golf together!

Channel Partners & Affiliations:

⛳ Shot Scope : https://bit.ly/46ep2nL
Use code TKGOLF15 for 15% off golf tech like watches and rangefinders!

🏌️‍♂️ The Sport Screen : https://thesportscreen.pxf.io/7a6RdO
Perfect for building your budget golf sim enclosure.

Products I Recommend;

Flightscope Mevo Plus: https://flightscopemevo.co.uk/
Golf Simulator Software: https://gsprogolf.com/

Thanks for watching TK Golf!

View Comments (7)
  1. I would like to see much tighter margins in FW numbers associated with loft angles. I have Mizuno 3 wood that's 13 deg, a Yasuda 4 wood at 19 deg, and a Bridgestone 5 wood at 18 deg…. To my mind, the Mizuno is basically a 2 wood, the Yasuda a 5, and the Bridgestone is in fact a 5 (the only one of the 3 that's being "honest" with its numbering. Brookes 16.5 "3" wood is more realistically a 4, which I think you acknowledge in your video. On that note, what happened to the old 2 wood, and does a 6 or an 8 wood even exist (because I also own a 7 wood, at 23 degrees)??

  2. Another consideration is likely that the M2 HL being 16.5° the Ping G430 was at 15* so that will cause flight pattern and total yard differences. I still have a 2017 M1 driver as one of many I use and will not part with it. I think they are better than the previous generations that have come out since. Personal preference

  3. I made the very same switch. The M2 3 wood was in my bag purely for decoration as I really lost confidence in hitting it. The Ping, with a shallower face, gave me a lot more confidence. So much so, I also traded in my M2 5 wood for the Ping. I am not Brooks, I play off 18.

Leave a Reply