Not as impressed with the tech as you, Andy, and the price is steeeeeeep ! I think the forward press at address was the point of the original Ping Anser offset ? And the anti twist technology seems a bit redundant in a putter, imo. But I am pleased it's working for as well as it does for you. Your putting looks to have improved greatly. I've just replaced my Cleveland HB 1 (Ping Anser copy) with an original Anser and they are light years apart. The Cleveland is just too light and hitting the ball squarely is difficult. The Anser is just perfect 🙂
1 Comment
Not as impressed with the tech as you, Andy, and the price is steeeeeeep ! I think the forward press at address was the point of the original Ping Anser offset ? And the anti twist technology seems a bit redundant in a putter, imo.
But I am pleased it's working for as well as it does for you. Your putting looks to have improved greatly.
I've just replaced my Cleveland HB 1 (Ping Anser copy) with an original Anser and they are light years apart. The Cleveland is just too light and hitting the ball squarely is difficult. The Anser is just perfect 🙂