This is Golfer Geeks’ head-to-head comparison of the Ping i240 vs Ping i230 irons.
I’ve hit both on the range and the course, tracking how they perform across distance, launch, forgiveness, and feel.
Quick Take: The Ping i240s and i230s perform similarly, if not the same, when you hit the sweet spot. (Sound, feel, launch, workability)
I got more out of the i240s on my mishits. i240s also fly higher than i230s on similarly struck shots. (~8 ft higher with 7-irons)
The i240s win on looks and peak height, but if you’re happy with the i230s, there’s no compelling reason to upgrade.
Need more forgiveness? – Go i240s.
Don’t & want to save a few hundred $? – Go i230s.
If you’re wondering whether the i240s are really an upgrade over the i230s — or just a slight tweak — this review covers the differences that matter most: forgiveness, trajectory, and value.
I’m a 7ish-handicap golfer chasing a 2 (been as low as 5.6), and I’ve been reviewing and testing golf equipment since 2015. If you’re looking for honest, hands-on feedback with no fluff, you’re in the right place.
Ping i240 Irons
Set Tested: 4-PW
Shaft: Nippon Pro Modus3 Tour 115 Stiff Flex
Why Consider the Ping i240 Irons?
The Ping i240 irons nail a difficult balance: player iron looks with game-improvement forgiveness.
They’re Ping’s highest-launching player iron ever, featuring a shorter blade length than the i230s for a more compact, confidence-inspiring look at address.
Key Features:
Smart weight redistribution: Lighter badge and insert save weight that moves to the perimeter for higher MOI
Lower CG: Creates Ping’s highest-launching player iron trajectory
Shorter blade length: More compact than i230s with perfect proportions
Three loft options: Power Spec (jacked), Standard (traditional), and Retro (weaker) lofts
Who they’re for: Low handicaps that don’t mind added forgiveness, distance, and higher ball flight.
Ping i240 Iron Specs (Standard Loft)
Club
Loft
Lie
Length
4
22.5*
59.8*
38.5″
5
26*
60.5*
38″
6
29.5*
61.3*
37.5″
7
33*
62*
37″
8
37*
62.8*
36.5″
9
41*
63.5*
36″
PW
45*
64.1*
35.5″
My Experience with the Ping i240 Irons
I’m smitten. The head shape and profile are absolutely perfect to my eye—clean, confidence-inspiring, and they frame the ball beautifully.
Cosmetics are solid, but it’s the shape that really steals the show.
The i240s look like true player’s irons without being intimidating, especially in the mid and long irons. The topline and sole strike that sweet spot—refined but forgiving.
From my first range session, they performed well right away. The feel at impact was a pleasing “click”—solid, slightly soft, and never harsh or hollow. Not quite the best feel I’ve ever experienced, but it’s close. They reminded me of the i230s I tested back in 2022.
They launch high, carry well, and let you shape your shots. I saw my usual slight pushes, pulls, and the occasional mini-draw—all playable.
I even worked through the long irons, which I usually avoid. These want to get airborne, even on mishits. For me, long irons are “area fire” clubs—I just want to be in the general zone. The i240s do that reliably.
Consistency was the theme throughout the set. When struck well, they send the ball high, long, and straight. My typical misses stayed near the green.
Overall, a very satisfying set. I’d happily game these any day.
Customer Reviews – What Others Are Saying
Ping i230 Irons
Set Tested: 4-PW
Shaft: True Temper Dynamic Gold 105 S300 (Stiff)
Why Consider the Ping i230 Irons?
The Ping i230 irons are designed for players who don’t mind added forgiveness at address and in performance. They deliver superb feel, flight, distance, and playability with consistent gapping.
Key Features:
Four-layer cavity badge: Elastomer insert dampens harsh frequencies for softer feel
Tungsten toe & tip weights: Increased forgiveness and distance
Rounded leading edge: Better turf interaction
MicroMax grooves: Consistent launch and spin
Longer blade length: More traditional player-distance profile
Who they’re for: Solid ball-strikers from about a 10 handicap on down.
Ping i230 Iron Specs
Club
Loft
Lie
Length
PW
45*
64.1*
35.5″
9
41*
63.5*
36″
8
37*
62.8*
36.5″
7
33*
62*
37″
6
29.5*
61.3*
37.5″
5
26*
60.5*
38″
4
22.5*
59.8*
38.5″
My Experience with the Ping i230 Irons
My first thought out of the box? “These blades are a little long.” (I’ve sense changed my mind after seeing them again and putting them side-by-side with the i240s)
But the minimalist design won me over fast. At address, they look clean and confidence-inspiring—very Ping.
I was hoping they’d feel like the G425s or G410s, and they delivered. My first strike with the PW confirmed it—solid, muted, just the way I like it.
Performance on the launch monitor was promising: high launch, solid distance, tight dispersion, and a slight draw when I caught it right. That translated to the course too. Even after a 5-week break and some rust, I was around or on the green most holes. Scoring wasn’t great—but that was on me, not the clubs.
Customer Reviews – What Others Are Saying
100% 5-star reviews with 11 reviews at ping.com (No reviews currently on Ping website)
What Are the Key Differences Between Ping i240 and i230 Irons?
How Do the 7-Iron Launch Numbers Compare?
Club
Club Speed
Ball Speed
Carry Distance (yds)
Peak Height (ft)
i240
81
111
165
77
i230
80
110
163
71
How Do Ping i240 and i230 Irons Compare Side-by-Side?
Category
Ping i240s
Ping i230s
Looks
4
4
Sound/Feel
4
4
Distance
4.5
4
Forgiveness
5
4
Flight/Playability
5
4
Value
4
4
Which Ping Iron Looks Better?
This one’s close, but I slightly prefer the i230s. Initially liked the i230s clean and minimalistic design much more. I’ve grown more fond of the i240s with time.
Head shape and size are similar and they both frame the ball beautifully at address.
Winner: i230s
Which Has Better Sound & Feel?
I give an ever-so-slight nod to the i240s. The i240s may be a tad softer at impact, but sound is identical to my ears. Not enough to affect my buying decision.
Neither feels harsh on mishits.
Winner: i240s
Which Ping Iron Goes Farther?
Nearly indistinguishable on solid contact. You get more distance from the i240s on mishits.
Winner: i240s
Which Ping Iron Is More Forgiving?
The i240s have it because you get more distance out of your mishits. Both maintain direction and ball flight on minor mishits.
Winner: i240s
Which Launches Higher and Flies Better?
Launch angle was nearly identical for the 7-iron from each set. The i240 7-iron’s peak height was 7 feet higher than the i230 7-iron (77 ft vs 71 ft).
That extra height helps with stopping power on greens and gives you more confidence with approach shots, especially from distance.
Winner: i240s
Which Ping Iron Is a Better Value?
The i230s—though by less than I thought.
For some reason, Ping is asking ~$187/club new. The i240s are $200/club new.
Winner: i230s
How Do Ping i240 and i230 Irons Stack Up: Full Comparison
i240
i230
Overall Score
4.4
4.0
Price
~$200/club
~$187/club
Launch
Higher
High
Loft Options
Power Spec, Standard, Retro
Standard only
Release Year
2025
2022
Final Verdict – Should you buy the i240s or i230s?
Differences between the i240 irons and i230 irons are minimal other than cosmetics.
But, those differences are there.
Get the Ping i240 Irons if:
You need a little more forgiveness and help hitting the ball higher.
You don’t mind spending a little more.
You value loft customization options and/or like having the latest model.
Get the Ping i230 Irons if:
You hit the sweet spot consistently.
You’re not as concerned with distance loss on minor mishits and you hit the ball high enough as is.
You’re more of a bargain hunter and don’t care about having the latest model.
As always, my #1 suggestion is to test both sets before you buy. Either at your local shop or through Global Golf’s Utry program.
Thanks for checking out our Ping i240 Irons vs i230 Irons comparison.
Editor’s Pick
Pros:
Satisfying Sound & FeelPlenty Distance & ForgivenessHigh-Launching Long IronsPerfect player profile
Highly Recommended
Pros:
Long & ForgivingGreat Sound & FeelEasy to elevate & great trajectory
