On this edition of Holy Nova, we discuss the latest summer storylines around Villanova Basketball:
🏀 Eric Dixon Injury Update — What does Villanova’s all-time leading scorer’s setback mean for his future with the Los Angeles Lakers?
🏀 Big 5 Pod Shuffle — How Nova’s new Big 5 Pod partners will reshape the Wildcats’ non-conference schedule.
🏀 Top 5 One-on-One Legends — Our picks for who would win a 1-on-1 Tournament of Villanova greats.
If you love Villanova hoops and Philly basketball, make sure to subscribe for the latest news, analysis, and debates!
#VillanovaBasketball #EricDixon #Big5 #NovaNation #VillanovaHistory #Lakers #NBADraft2025 #NBAFreeAgency #VillanovaBasketball #bigeastbasketball
SUBSCRIBE AND CHECK OUT ALL THINGS BIG EAST ENERGY AT
 https://linktr.ee/bigeastenergy
Eric Dixon has suffered an injury serious enough 
 to keep him out of the entire NBA summer league. How big a setback is this for Nova’s all-time 
 leading scorer? Speaking of Villanova legends, we’re going to figure out who would win a 
 one-on-one tournament amongst all Villanova   players in the entire Big East era. See if 
 you agree with our list next on Holy Nova. And hi, everybody. Welcome to Holy Nova, 
 part of the Big East Energy Network. I’m   Matt Janice with David White. David, a fun show 
 today for sure. We’re going to debate who would be in the top five players in a one-on-one 
 tournament. But before we get to the fun, we have to deal with some less than fun news. Eric 
 Dixon, though it was an all-time leading scorer, went undrafted. Obviously, we talked about 
 that being a little bit of a surprise. And now   you find out that he has an injury that’s serious 
 enough that he’s going to be sidelined the entire NBA Summer League. He has been spotted going 
 around Las Vegas in a boot on a scooter. That doesn’t sound good. It is an apparent foot injury. 
 never what you want to hear when talking about a big man. I guess there are two questions when you 
 think about this with Eric Dixon and this injury. A, does it impact his ability to make the Lakers? 
 And B, if he makes the Lakers, does the injury really limit his ability to find a big role as a 
 first of all, we have to figure out how serious the injury is. Walking around in a boot and on 
 a scooter never bodes well. That usually can be an Achilles or it could be something as simple 
 as a severe ankle sprain. So whatever that is, we need to find out. But obviously not playing 
 in the summer league is really going to hurt his prospects with the Lakers for this year. I think 
 that if the Lakers really were invested in them, they would have used a draft pick on him. Going 
 undrafted makes it seem like he’s definitely fighting for a roster spot. I mean, I will say 
 that the Lakers seem to be in a little bit of a upheaval if LeBron is actually going to leave. 
 There could be spots opening for different role players coming up and Who knows? That’s the big 
 thing. But I think it definitely doesn’t help. LeBron putting an organization in up people? I’ve 
 never heard of that before. That can’t possibly   be a thing. He’s such a team player. He’s never 
 done that to any organization I’ve ever heard of. It is just amazing as the world turn seems to 
 follow LeBron wherever he goes. But from Dickson’s perspective, you know, my initial thought was 
 perhaps the injury, maybe teams had heard about it and shied away from drafting him as a result. 
 Because if you looked at almost every draft board mock draft going into that June selection, I think 
 universally it was expected he would go somewhere. But then the athletic reports that the Lakers have 
 not actually signed the deal yet with Eric because he was supposed to sign a two-way contract. And 
 it makes you think that perhaps either this was unknown or this crept up late in the process. 
 There’s a lot more questions than there is   answers at this point, which is never a position 
 that you want to be in. Obviously, it leads people like us speculating and the spotlight even 
 grows larger because it’s the Los Angeles Lakers. Everybody talking about L.A. as Randy Newman 
 once said, I love L.A. and so does the rest of the world. But it just is very interesting. And 
 it’s a shame because this is a guy that we talked about it when we discussed about did the NBA get 
 it wrong? It a real chance to prove people wrong. but you got to be out there. Availability is the 
 most important ability and doesn’t look like he’s   going to have it at least for a little bit. No, 
 I think that the Lakers are probably holding that two-way contract. Probably to answer the question 
 that we first came on with is how severe is this injury? Is this just, he can’t compete in summer 
 league and A month from now, he’s going to be fine working out in practice, doing everything, 
 or is this a longer-term injury that could keep him out for potentially months into the season? 
 So I think that’s the first thing the Lakers are going to do. I think if it’s the former and it’s 
 just, hey, I’m going to be out for summer league, but I’ll be back by August – end of August, 
 beginning of September, the Lakers probably still signed that two way contract, he probably 
 still has a good shot at making a roster. But not knowing what exactly the injury is, is really 
 putting a damper on what could be for Eric Dixon. It’s so funny because it felt like such a good fit 
 and real opportunity for them. We’ll see how it plays out as the news not ideal, although we don’t 
 know the full news. That’s the weirdest part, it feels like to me. There’s no shortage of Lakers 
 reporters. There’s no shortage of Lakers info out there. Heck, they reported the fact that they 
 saw them going around on a scooter in a boot in   Las Vegas. So people are clearly looking for the 
 story, but they don’t have any more information than that, seems strange. And it’s just kind of 
 coming out in bits and pieces. One thing that came out completely was the news this week from 
 the Big Five. We knew that the pods were going to switch up. We just didn’t know officially what 
 it would look like. Remember, a couple years ago,   they reworked the Big Five. It’s no longer around, 
 Robin. You play two regular season games against the six teams that are in the Big Five. College 
 sports now, numbers don’t matter anymore when it comes to names. They never quite line up with 
 Drexel becoming a full-time member of the Big   Five. So Villanova had been in a pod with St. 
 Joe’s and Penn, meaning they had played them each of the last two regular seasons. Now they will be 
 in a pod with LaSalle and Temple. So that means they’ll play LaSalle and Temple. How those results 
 go will dictate where they finish, and then they will play a third game at whatever they’re calling 
 the Wells Fargo Center when basketball season   comes around, the Sixers Arena down in South 
 Philadelphia. And… It will be against, depending if they are in first, second, or third place in 
 their respective situation. But the point remains, no Holy War this year. And, of course, the St. 
 Joe’s fans are upset about that. And Patrick Madden had a really good article, our friend, and 
 our colleague here on the Big East Energy Network   on his Big Big East blog about the changing nature 
 of the Big Five and some of the reactions to the new schedule and the new matchups. David, does 
 this really matter? It doesn’t feel like Villanova fans are all that upset about it, but I guess also 
 Villanova fans are kind of getting used to being   blamed for everything that happens in the Big 
 Five that people don’t like. Well, I think that Villanova fans, especially younger fans, don’t 
 have the same endearment to the big five and what it used to mean to the city of Philadelphia. As an 
 outsider, I’ll be the wet blanket that says, okay, you play. Nova is clearly in the best league. 
 They’re clearly been the best team over the last decade plus. Honestly, playing a round robin 
 against all of those teams probably hurts your net ranking. hurts your ability to go to the NCAA 
 tournament. So for Nova fans, I understand not really being that overly concerned about the big 
 five. feel for the other fan bases out there who obviously have a novo on the schedule would be 
 a huge gift for them or let me hop in for a sec just to again defend somebody that has been around 
 and heard this a time or two don’t buy into the propaganda this was not just villanova that wanted 
 to get out of the round robin temple was involved in that as well Schedule flexibility in this day 
 and age. You mentioned the three-letter word, net. You have to be able to schedule games that are 
 going to put you in the best situation net-wise   possible. Certainly for Villanova, the ability 
 to schedule Michigan, to schedule Wisconsin, and to schedule that game against BYU to start the 
 season is why they were looking for a different   scenario. But I think Temple was as well. And 
 you didn’t get a big… real argument from st joe’s pan lasalle and then drexel’s just happy 
 to be along for the ride and one other thing that is important to remember I love the big 
 five I grew up going to the big five I don’t go all the way back to when every game was played 
 of the palestra But some of my favorite childhood memories were going to Holy Wars in the Palestra 
 or going to Villanova Temple games. They didn’t play many of those in the Palestra, but either 
 at the Apollo back when it opened or McGonagall   Hall or the Spectrum. They had a few games there. 
 Loved the Big Five. Big proponent of the Big Five. But the last year they played the round robin, 
 they played three games at the Palestra and like twenty three hundred people showed up. So 
 it wasn’t just Villanova fans that weren’t   all in on it anymore. It wasn’t the draw it had 
 been. And you’re locking these teams into these schedules. I think everybody understood something 
 had to change. The big thing now that you’re kind of looking at is the revisionist history from the 
 St. Joe’s fans to the And suddenly, now that the Holy War isn’t happening every year, lay this 
 all at Villanova’s feet. I think it was always   an understanding that they would reevaluate this 
 thing every couple of years. And as you alluded to, the other fan bases want a shot at Villanova. 
 We had Ray Dunn on our Temple Insider during the   Zion Stanford episode a couple weeks ago. And if 
 you haven’t seen that, I recommend you go back and check it out. But he was very clear. Temple fans 
 were very disappointed to not have a chance to play Villanova. at Leah Cora’s center. They want 
 that game. That game means something to them. And for it to not be there for a couple of years, they 
 were very adamant that something had to change.   And I think that’s why they made the switches that 
 they did. And let me clarify my point. I am not placing all the blame at Villanova’s feet. And I 
 think it’s completely normal for a rival to say, it’s your fault that things are not the same as 
 they’ve always been. My point is, I don’t care whose fault it is. I don’t care if it was Nova’s, 
 Temple’s, St. Joe’s, LaSalle’s. I don’t care. I think it works out better for Nova in the long run 
 than it does for any of the other big five schools because Nova is the ticket. Obviously, if you’re 
 in the Nova pod, it’s great for you. You get a chance at a high quality win that would boost any 
 tournament resume. maybe every I mean I don’t want to ruffle any feathers with uh temple and st joe’s 
 fans but no ruffle away especially ruffle away but I mean the likelihood of that being a great 
 win or a quad one victory just it’s not as high as it is if you have nova on the schedule so 
 it works out better for nova to be able to go schedule Two other even high mid-major teams that 
 would be a quad two win, maybe a quad one win, depending on where you play it. That’s just 
 a better scenario for Nova if they’re looking at getting an at-large win. I think the biggest 
 disappointment, I did like the old quad better. I will acknowledge that. I think Temple right 
 now, it’s an argument between Temple St. Joe’s, the second best program in the city, but there 
 is that Holy War nostalgia and the two schools being so close. And, you know, both Catholic 
 institutions, but of different derivants. I just think that game matters. You’d like to see that 
 happen. And then Pan being on the schedule means   you get to go play the Palestra every other year. 
 And I will miss Villanova having no chance to play because LaSalle just redid Gola. So that game is 
 going to be at Gola when they play at LaSalle.   And then Temple never plays at the Palestra. So 
 to me, that’s the downside of the new pod. But I understand spreading it around makes complete 
 sense. And, you know, change, unfortunately, is inevitable. And as we talked about during the 
 last episode, look, for Villanova fans, it feels   like it matters much more to not lose the Big Five 
 games than it does to win. I mean, you want to win every game, but in the Big Five, you’re just not 
 getting the quality of opponents that right now. Maybe that will change, but right now you’re not 
 getting the quality of opponents that you would   like to out of it. If somebody does end up being 
 good and if Villanova gets back to where they think they’re going to be under Kevin Willard, 
 they’ll end up playing at the Wells Fargo Center   anyway. And that will be a ton of fun. The Holy 
 War. Two great teams or two good teams or whatever it might end up being. But being for the Big Five 
 City Championship, I think people would be into   that for sure. Speaking of championships. Sorry, 
 I was going to say the exact same thing. I mean, you lose out on that St. Joe’s rivalry during 
 the pod play, but you have the chance of a Big Five Championship game at Wells Fargo between the 
 two. The other thing is you’re exactly right with Villanova fans not wanting to lose because losing 
 one of those games ultimately hurts you more than winning helps you, I think. Like if that math’s in 
 everybody’s head. I mean, unfortunately, the way the networks, it does seem like that matters more 
 than anything else. Who you play, where you play, the road games carry so much weight. The whole 
 thing is a mess. Didn’t mean to cut you off   there. I was so proud of my mediocre transition 
 that I was about to try to do. But speaking of championships, we’re creating our own mythical 
 championship. We were putting together the best… one-on-one teams in the history of the Big East. 
 And each show was trying to put together their list. Ours got delayed a little bit because we’ve 
 had guests the last couple weeks. Then we had   some NBA news that we had to get to with former 
 Villanova players. But finally, we want to get to ours. Let’s unveil. So what this is, it In the 
 prime of their Villanova careers, we were trying to rank the top five players if we were going 
 to have a one-on-one tournament. Not one-on-one   within a five-man game, but like Bird versus MJ, 
 the old video game, a one-on-one showdown. Who would come out on top? We put together our list of 
 top five, and let’s take a look at that right now, and then we’ll come back and discuss it. Fun 
 topic this week, the Big East Energy Network has charged us with putting together a list of 
 the top one-on-one players in the history of   the Big East. So without further ado, here’s Holy 
 Nova’s nominations for the Wildcats. First of all, if this was an all-time list, Howard Porter would 
 be on it, but he predates the Big East era. Our honorable mention, you got to have somebody from 
 Raleigh’s era, right? So we chose to go with Doug West, although he did not make the top five. Our 
 fifth choice might be a little bit of a surprise. Corey Fisher didn’t have the career that many 
 hoped for with the Wildcats, but he’s a New   York City playground legend. So he’s on the top 
 five for the Wildcats. Number four is Randy Foy. Here’s a guy who once played basically one-on-five 
 in a Sweet Sixteen game offensively off the bounce and won the game against Boston College to get 
 Villanova to the regional final. I think I like his chances in a one-on-one situation. Number 
 three, Kerry Kittles. He’s the GOAT, but he was a little bit better coming off the ball, moving 
 without the ball. Still, his electricity near the rim. And the fact that he was once drafted ahead 
 of Kobe Bryant. Yes, that’s right, ladies and gentlemen, ahead of Kobe Bryant gives you an idea 
 just how good he is. He has to be on the list.   Number two might be a little bit controversial. 
 Jalen Brunson, one of the best players in the NBA right now, and certainly seems like he can get his 
 shot off against the best in the world at any time he wants. But if you’re going to play one-on-one, 
 you also have to play a little bit of defense. And   I would wonder how long the game might last with 
 Jalen, even with his back-to-the-basket skills and his creativity. I have to have him behind. Number 
 one on our list, Kyle Lowry. Pure electricity. As athletic, as shifty, as fast as they come. 
 And a guy that is so strong, so physical, so tough-minded, and also a pretty good on-ball 
 defender. He’ll pick your pocket a few times. I like Lowry’s electricity. He goes to the top. a 
 list for me. What do you think about the top five all time at Villanova? All right, so that was the 
 video we put together, and we do want to hear what you think. Go ahead and rip our list to shreds in 
 the comment section below. Would love to have your impact. I know there were a couple names that I 
 controversially left off. One thing that I have   heard a lot of from people when we talk about 
 that list is the fact that there are too many guards. There And size is kind of a thing that I 
 ignore too much when it comes to the one-on-one game. How’s a six-one guy going to go up against 
 a six-seven, six-eight guy? There’s some truth to   that, I understand. But two things in my defense. 
 A, don’t always guard you, man. I mean, come on. What do you think that it’s going to be? There’s 
 not exactly a lot of Kevin Durant. in the history   of this program over the course of the Big East 
 era. So I’m going to stick with the guards when the opportunities are there. And, B, you know, you 
 talked – I talked to a lot of people about this inside the sport in terms of their thoughts, 
 guards versus bigs in a one-on-one matchup. The consensus seemed to be you would think bigs 
 because they could shoot over you, but long-term – quickness and their ability to stick with it and 
 kind of extend the game and use their athleticism, it’s going to be a huge asset that it’s going to 
 be hard for the bigs to really match up against. What do you think, Dave? I mean, I am in your 
 boat right now in terms of guards versus bigs. Right now, let’s just stick with that. We don’t 
 have to keep talking. You take centers off the board. That’s ridiculous. I’ve I’d love to see 
 Shaq out there trying to dribble the ball around. I do want some size, though, in my wing players. 
 I think that the best one-on-one guy is probably a guy who’s somewhere from six, four to six, 
 ten, who can guard somebody taller than them, but also has the scoring ability to get to the 
 basket, get easy buckets. Given the parameters… It’s a one-on-one game. We’re not playing 
 five-on-five and we’re just talking about the   guy who can just break down a primary defender. 
 Just one-on-one straight up based on their time at Villanova. I don’t know how Tim Thomas is 
 not on the list. He was a bucket getter. He was a bucket getter. He was a guy, look, there might 
 be a little bit of personal bias on that as well. Tim Thomas was the most infuriating Villanova 
 player, arguably of my lifetime. Loved the guy, loved what he became in the NBA. And I think 
 that he had a ton of skills, but There was some lapses in concentration over the course 
 of the game. And to me, in a one-on-one game,   when you don’t have anybody that can help you, if 
 you have a couple of lapses, boom, you lose the game. You go head-to-head with Jalen Brunson or 
 Kyle Lowry in a one-on-one game and you kind of zone out for a little bit. they’re going to get 
 you and they’re going to beat you. Yeah. Maybe   that’s a little bit of a miss on my part. The, 
 the Corey Fisher one, here’s the thing. You had to have a Raleigh representative and I still think 
 I’d go Doug West head to head against Tim Thomas, Tim Thomas, better basketball player. I would 
 take Doug West in a one-on-one game against him,   but we’d have to see. Um, the Corey Fisher one was 
 anytime you build the reputation that Corey Fisher did on the playgrounds of New York city. And the 
 guy had a, he was Fisher. Nice. I mean, that was his nickname. It was Fisher price because he would 
 play, play with guys, uh, out in, in New York   city. I think your game’s going to translate to 
 the one-on-one thing and you saw him do things off the bounce. I just don’t know how Tim Thomas would 
 have ever stayed in front of him. And all it takes is a couple steals and, boom, game over. So I’m 
 sticking with Corey Fisher. I think I might be the   only one. So I would just say that in a one-on-one 
 game, inevitably, you’re going to get somebody who’s just going to take a shot and they’re going 
 to miss. And if Tim Thomas gets a rebound and it’s make it, take it, I don’t know that he’s missing. 
 All right. All right. I’ll give you that. Another one that I had some buyers remember were two of 
 the national championship era guys. And that would have gotten me the size that I did not put in my 
 list. Dante DiVincenzo and Josh Hart. You stole Josh Hart from me. I was bringing him up. The 
 thing about Josh Hart is, again… There are so many things that Josh Hart does well. Josh Hart is 
 a streak shooter and misses a lot. I think that, as you just said, in a one-on-one game, there’s 
 only going to be so many misses. Josh Hart’s   ability to get a stop, I don’t question. But I 
 just think if you’re putting Josh Hart toe-to-toe against a Lowry or a Brunson, I mean, I would love 
 to hear them debate this on their podcast right now. Who would win a one-on-one game between 
 Brunson and Hart? Mm-hmm. So my problem with Kyle Lowry is just six foot. I understand he’s 
 tenacious. I understand he’s strong. My problem is that if Josh Hart just decides, I’m just 
 going to back you down, what’s Lowry going to do? He’s either going to body up and Hart’s 
 going to spin off and have a layup every time, or he’s going to be put under the basket. I 
 just, I don’t see a six foot guard being able to consistently stop a six five plus wing player, 
 except for, I see again. And I, I took some grief for this guard. You, I understand, but Kyle Lowry 
 made a living off of that in the NBA. I mean, guys tried to body him up inside, take him to the 
 post and Kyle Lowry as, as Kyle Lowry was the guy that invented the Villanova wall. Let’s be honest. 
 Jay Wright was the one that taught it, but it was   Kyle Lowry’s ability to do it. at six feet tall 
 and defend inside and keep you from moving on him that I just feel like he would be able to hold 
 his own and again you’re looking for two or three stops plus nobody’s gonna have quicker hands than 
 kyle lowry and if he gets real frustrated you just do like you did in the kansas game he’ll punch 
 you in the gonads and move off you gotta always   look out for that too in a one-on-one game yeah my 
 problem is that yes Definitely. In the NBA, he’s become the guy who walls up. He can get steals off 
 of guards. The problem in a one-on-one game is the ball handler is not worried about any help coming. 
 They’re not worried about anybody digging down. All they have to do is worry about Kyle Lowry. 
 Are they going to allow him to just come around and steal it from them? I don’t think so. Well, 
 okay, here’s my thing. If there is a shot clock, that is the one specification of the rule. If Josh 
 Hart has fifty seconds to shoot the basketball, yes, eventually he will score every single time. 
 But in a one-on-one game, you would think it’s,   you know, a fifteen to twenty-five second 
 deal where you gotta get a shot off. Yeah, I think Lowry could wall him up, and I don’t think 
 Josh Hart’s fadeaway is consistent enough. It’s the same reason why I didn’t pick DiVincenzo. 
 I think eventually there’d be a couple misses,   and then I think Lowry would just beat him off 
 the bounce over and over and over I don’t think you’re getting the ball back from kyle lowry 
 oh I would definitely have kyle lowry in the top five I I would probably have jalen brunson one 
 just because he gives you a little more size but I mean I don’t fault you for taking kyle lowry 
 considering his tenacity considering everything he does defensively his speed and quickness with 
 the ball I i We’re pulling, we’re splitting hairs right now trying to find arguments for just really 
 great basketball players. Look, I was really proud of myself that I put Kerry Kittles third. Again, 
 my email address has a thirty in it. I love Kerry Kittles that much. But you gotta admit, as much 
 as it is impressive that John Calipari Now, he, in retrospect, will tell you he wanted to draft 
 Kobe all along, and it was the front office that   overruled him. I don’t remember ever reading about 
 that back in the day. I’m pretty sure Cal fell in love with Kerry Kittles as well and decided to 
 draft Kittles over Kobe Bryant. But nevertheless, the fact remains that an NBA front office was 
 looking at shooting guard in that draft, and they said, we want Kittles’ skills over Bryant. I think 
 Kittles is one of the more underrated players of the last twenty five, thirty years. He went toe to 
 toe gosh, we’re old. It’s actually a lot. I mean, man, Gary Kittles played twenty nine years ago at 
 this point. I almost didn’t give it enough room back to how long ago Kittles was at Villanova. But 
 yeah, in the last three decades, I’d argue that I mean, he went toe to toe with Iverson. He went 
 toe to toe with Ray Allen. And you could argue he was the best player in the league over the course 
 of his career during that time. Allen and Iverson Iverson obviously went on to better NBA careers, 
 but Kittles was a more productive college player. And I think he was good off the bounce and he 
 could create his own and nobody finished at   the rim as well as Kerry Kittles did. And he 
 has that size that you’re looking for at six, five. So if you’re telling me that size is the end 
 all be all, then maybe Kittles should have been   one on the list. But Kerry Kittle’s special sauce 
 was his movement without the basketball. I mean, my goodness, the man became famous because 
 Dick Vitale would go on three-minute aureas   about his movement without the basketball. You’d 
 go four or five possessions the other way back and forth before Dick Vitale stopped giving 
 his speeches about Kerry Kittle’s movement   without the basketball. He was that special and 
 obviously that’s useless in a one-on-one game. Yeah. And I mean, another factor that comes 
 into play considering the parameters of their   time at Villanova is how much weight do you put 
 on NCAA success? I mean, you have Jalen Brunson, who obviously won a national championship. Josh 
 Hart was huge on that twenty eighteen national championship team. Dante DiVincenzo was he was the 
 M.I.P. of the final four that year, right? Yeah, the thirty one points against Michigan. Uh 
 huh. So. It’s how important is that success too? Because while Kittles and Lowry, they were 
 all great, they did not have that NCAA success that’s Hey, listen. Newer guys did. If Curtis 
 Sumter does not tear his ACL, Kyle Lowry gets to at least one Final Four, maybe two. I just want 
 that on the record. Kyle Lowry also, by the way,   special credit to Kyle Lowry because he tore his 
 ACL the summer before his freshman year and was back playing by the middle of the season I still 
 don’t understand how that happened. Is he a bionic man? Whatever it was. But there was, again, a 
 toughness to Kyle Lowry that I just think matters in a one-on-one game. And that’s why I went with 
 him. And the other thing is, with Jalen Brunson, who’s calling the fouls? One-on-one game, you 
 got to call it yourself, right? Is Brunson really   going to call as many fouls as he gets in the NBA 
 these days? Does he have the courage to get that many whistles? That’s true. What whistle are we 
 playing by today’s NBA where if you breathe on a guy the wrong way, it’s a foul? Or are we playing 
 back in the nineties when Kittles was around and you could just clothesline a guy and that was a 
 common foul. I agree though. Toughness definitely would come into it because there’s no way you 
 can call fifteen fouls in a one-on-one game on your opponent. So, on this topic, you look at 
 it, you know, the bigs versus guards. We did it at a bunch of different schools in the Big East on 
 the Big East Energy Network. You know, a perfect example is probably Georgetown. I mean, would 
 you put Allen Iverson number one at Georgetown? Who’s beaten AI in a one-on-one game? I mean, it 
 would have to be Iverson. He’s six feet tall. That went right in the face of your own argument. 
 You’re killing me for Kyle Lowry because he’s six feet tall. The next greatest Georgetown 
 player is probably Patrick Ewing. And I don’t trust Patrick Ewing dribbling the ball on the 
 perimeter. Or Mutombo. Are we going to put Mutombo at the three-point line against a guard? Alonzo 
 Mourning. How about Ruben Boomchay Boomchay? The, you know, Reggie Wingate. There’s a lot of options 
 that you could have at Georgetown. But I mean, I’m not arguing against Allen Iverson. The answer 
 is Allen Iverson is the answer. I’m just saying I just wanted to lawyer the lawyer a little bit 
 there. I wanted to walk into that one. False equivalency. A.I. is A.I. I love Kyle Lowry. He’s 
 not quite AI. Yeah, you’re right. You know what it is? Kyle Lowry plays defense. AI is allergic to 
 defense. How’s he ever going to get a stop? He’s just going to take the ball. He’s going to win by 
 just having the ball. Oh, yeah, with that forty   percent field goal percentage that he had over the 
 course of his NBA career. It is. These are the fun conversations that you get to have in summer. It 
 would be fun to watch. You know, they play these alum tournaments. Now the players tournament, 
 they all have different names. And it is fun to   see these guys come back together and, and play, 
 you know, under a made-up banner under the name of these schools. But to imagine them at their 
 prime doing this, I think is the most fun part. The thing that is interesting to me about it is 
 when Mark was first explaining to me the concept, I thought he meant one-on-one in the parameters 
 of the five-on-five game. To me, for Villanova, that’s the more interesting conversation, David. 
 That’s a very different conversation. Exactly. And that’s where my list, sadly, would probably 
 look pretty similar. I would move Brunson ahead of Lowry, Lowry down one, Brunson on top. And 
 probably I’d move Randy Foy into the two spot and then Lowry number three. But it is… Kind of 
 interesting in that I don’t know how Villanova’s guys would match up in the one-on-one fictitious 
 tournament that we’ve created here. But in terms of one-on-one guys in the frame of the team game, 
 I think they do really, really well. That would be a much different look. Oh, I agree. Five-on-five 
 is just such a different game than just straight one-on-one. But I think that the Villanova guys, 
 I think Josh Hart, is a great one-on-one player in the concept of the offense. I just do. I think 
 he can break down a defender, get to the rim. Maybe I am higher on Josh Hart than most. I agree 
 with that. Any Knicks fans listening right now probably would not agree with that. Josh does run 
 hot and cold. That’s the biggest thing with Hart, right? Without a doubt. I mean, that’s basketball. 
 All of these guys, I mean, Brunson doesn’t run as hot and cold, but he’s going to have his games 
 where he’s just off. And if it’s the day that   you’re off, I don’t know what you want them to do 
 at that point. It is kind of funny. The two guys that we’re just kind of comparing in terms of, I 
 guess I was maybe talking a little bit more Lowry, but you could make an argument that in terms of 
 that one-on-one in the the realm of the team game, five-on-five, that of the last thirty years, 
 Novo and Georgetown, it could be AI and Brunson and then Kemba, right? That would probably be the 
 list for your three guys in the last thirty years,   one-on-one, in a five-man game? Yeah, I’m trying 
 to think of it. I mean, yeah. Maybe Rip? Rip? I mean, Rip could take over a game when he wanted 
 to. I mean, UConn’s got a long list, obviously. They were pretty darn good in a lot of different 
 ways. But to me, I mean, look at what – Jalen Brunson won two national championships. He was 
 a bit player the first time, but he was the guy, the national player of the year on arguably the 
 best team in the last quarter century. And then he – has gone to the NBA and far exceeded what 
 anyone thought. And I think what maybe we thought was a plucky underdog story, it’s kind of one 
 of the reasons why if I’m Jay Wright, I’m not going to the NBA. We’ve talked about that a little 
 bit in the past. But everybody thinks Jay Wright created something on his own, and he did. But he 
 had better players than I think a lot of people give those Villanova teams credit for. They’re 
 starting to finally get that respect a little bit   different. But Jalen Wright’s retired now, so his 
 legacy’s kind of cemented. But if he comes to the NBA and it didn’t work out, he’s still going to 
 be a Hall of Famer and a legend, but he might not be viewed as one of the two or three best coaches 
 of the last twenty years anymore because he might kind of be, hey, he won two and three with a 
 freakishly talented team. Yeah, and I think that… I can’t believe I just said something 
 that isn’t complimentary about Jay Wright. That   goes against everything I believe in as a human 
 being, by the way. I take it back. I think that it can be a compliment to Jay Wright, too, just 
 because those guys were overlooked because of the offense that Jay ran, which was team-centered. It 
 wasn’t any one guy just going to get his shot. It wasn’t… We’re running on ball. We’re running 
 an NBA offense. We’re just going to on ball and go downhill and hope you can score. We’re going 
 to pass it around. We’re going to run an offense. We’re going to get the best shot. Whoever gets 
 that best shot, it doesn’t matter to the team. We’re going to play team basketball. And now those 
 guys are in a system in the NBA where it’s easier to shine as a one-on-one player because that is 
 the NBA philosophy outside of maybe Golden State. And we’ll see what the Knicks do with Brown now 
 that he’s coming in. And maybe Pop when he was in San Antonio. But other than that, you’re talking 
 what? twenty nine teams that run basically the same version of the same offense. who says 
 lawyers can’t do math. That’s pretty good. We can’t see your fingers, though, in the shot. I 
 know you were adding it up there underneath. Hey, you know what I just realized? As it’s British 
 Open week, as we tape this and we’ll put it out, it’s a little embarrassing. I guess 
 I’m a one-trick pony. I, in this video,   wore two different Ryder Cup shirts. Is that sad 
 on my part? Is that… I mean… got this one I’m I’m ready though brady show but you gotta pick 
 the open championship as they call it these days I have not watched a full round of golf since 
 tigers prime I’ve I’ve I’m a bad golf fan I mean I don’t know what to say about it. You were 
 a Tiger fan. You weren’t a golf fan. I’ve seen you play golf. It makes sense. I wouldn’t like golf 
 too much if I had a swing like you either. Listen, I’m just saying if they plant a tree in the 
 middle of the green, I would hit it every   time. But they refused to put a tree there. Not if 
 you were aiming at that tree in the middle of the green. You wouldn’t hit it every time. That’s the 
 fundamental thing. If you aim forty yards right, you might hit the tree in the center of the green. 
 Well, they have to tell me the hole is over there, but the tree is actually on the green. So I think 
 that I’m hitting it towards the hole. Well, just for the record, you know, I was so good at picking 
 the one-on-one team, got ripped to shreds by those of us on this video and maybe some others in the 
 Big East Energy Network. But I am going to make a   winning pick. John Rahm is going to win this week. 
 Mark it down. Take it to the proverbial window, even though we’re not supposed to do that. 
 John Rahm, winner this week. All right. Well,   I’m writing it down right now. It’s ten sixteen 
 written. Hey, look, we promised some lists. There was our first list. We’re going to have more 
 of those. We’ll look back at some of the past   stuff from Villanova and kind of take it apart. 
 Twenty-five years of this century, we’re going to look back at some of the most impactful players. 
 I think we’ve got that coming up. And we’re also – you’re a guy that, you know, you’ve been following 
 Villanova here pretty closely the last – half   decade or so, started to do the show and even 
 closer, but he did not grow up amongst it. And so we’re going to go back and look at maybe some 
 games of the past that you’ve never seen before.   I’m going to give you some homework assignments. 
 You’re going to go watch them for the first time, and we’re going to kind of talk about them and see 
 how it is. We are not going to do the ridiculous Alan Ray travel game. From the North Carolina 
 graduate, keeps telling me that he wants to do   the one, two, three Bill Raftery game, and we’re 
 not going to do it. One, two, three. I’m making Bill. He knows his math. Except we still never saw 
 the three. That was the only problem. He said one, two, three. We just didn’t see it. It was the 
 lighting and camera angles. That was the problem. Bill saw it live. That was Kyle Lowry’s coming 
 out party to the national world. That was when   they realized how he almost single-handedly beat 
 that North Carolina team that went on to win a national championship. Yeah. No, I sweated to that 
 game. We can talk about that part of the game. We’re just not going to go to the counting part. 
 Love rap, but that was bad. Even Vern Lundquist couldn’t go with him on that. He goes, I don’t 
 know about that, Bill. All right, good show, David. Appreciate it. Have fun. All right. That’ll 
 do it for this edition of Holy Nova. We’ll be back next week with much more. Make sure to follow 
 along on Twitter at Holy Nova Podcast. Make sure you like and subscribe the videos. My kids keep 
 telling me that’s very important on the YouTube   scene. Like them, smash that subscribe button, 
 whatever the lingo is that they will make. Hey, hey, you don’t even know, but that’ll do 
 it for us. We will talk to you very soon.
 