Try The Athletic for FREE for 30 days: http://theathletic.com/tifo

Cricket’s “underarm incident” was so controversial it drew furious responses from two prime ministers.

Follow Tifo Sports:
TikTok: @tifosports
Facebook: @tifosports1
Instagram: @tifosports_

About Tifo Sports:
Tifo creates in-depth historical and geopolitical breakdowns of sports across the globe.

We know there’s an appetite for thoughtful, intelligent content. For stuff that makes the complicated simple.

We provide analysis on the NBA, NFL, tennis, golf and more.

Tifo was founded in 2017 and became a part of The Athletic in 2020. The Athletic brings you world-class sports journalism from the best team of writers in the world. Whether it’s exclusive interviews, insightful podcasts or thought-provoking stories, The Athletic has you covered.

For business inquiries, reach out to tifo@theathletic.com.

Additional footage sourced from freestockfootagearchive.com

#Shorts #Cricket #Sports

42 Comments

  1. I know literally nothing about cricket but if it wasn't against the rules then it seems like it's fair game. Someone has to break the spirit of the game to show the gaps in the rules I reckon

  2. this is deeply within NZ lore. I was born a long time after yet I can quote the entire thing, and it's practically a kiwi meme commenting on how scummy australians are

  3. So in early days of cricket, bowlers bowled with underarm action. Slowly, this changed and bowlers started using round arm action(bowling by moving the entire arm in a round way)
    But the MCC, the governing body of cricket, just accepted round arm bowling and never changed the rules to make underarm bowling illegal. So Greg Chappell was aware of this, and he instructed his brother to bowl in that manner, knowing fully well that whatever they were doing wasnt illegal. It was after this incident that underarm bowling was finally outlawed from cricket's rules. In 2005, during the inaugural T20(20 overs per side) match between New Zealand and Australia, the two teams revisited this bitter incident in a very cheeky manner. New Zealand were chasing, and had already lost the match, as they needed 50+ runs in the final over to win(the max you can score in a legal over is 36, by hitting every ball for a six). So Glenn McGrath, Australia's premier fast bowler and one of cricket's greatest bowlers of all time, cheekily bowled an underarm ball. Both the teams had a good laugh about this, and i think McGrath was shown a red card by the umpire as part of the joke.

  4. That's Australian mentality of winning! They'll go to any extreme to win the match!
    Because when you win the trophy nothing will be remembered! It's about winning or losing the game who cares about spirit of the game at all?

  5. To me, this is similar to the fake quarterback slide in American football or the infield fly in baseball. It exploited an unseen loophole that SHOULD have been illegal but wasn’t. Defense attorneys everywhere were probably smiling.

  6. I was 14 when this happened and was absolutely appalled. I still occasionally recall how I never saw the Chapelles from that point as anything other than toerags. A national disgrace.

  7. It's important to note that historically, in cricket, "the spirit of the game" had been almost more important than the rules. Hence the expression "that's just not cricket". And hence both sides condemning the action even if legally there was nothing to penalise.

  8. The Aussies NEED to win, really NEED to win at ANY cost. They have NO shame at all. "Sport" died years ago once Big Money became involved.

  9. When Greg Chappel toured NZ the year after, his first game walking out to bat a lawn ball was rolled out of the crowd at him to much laughter.

  10. It was a legal ball. New Zealand and anyone else complaining need to realise it was legal to do it at the time. Brilliant move by the Chappell brother's. That ball won the series. 🏆🎉🎉🎉

Write A Comment