How accurate is the Square Golf Launch Monitor club data feature? We’re answering that exact question with an in-depth club data accuracy test for the uber-popular Square Golf Launch Monitor!
=============================
Other Videos Mentioned in this Video
=============================
⚡️ Square Golf Launch Monitor Review ➡️ https://youtu.be/M2d9-6tjsHw
⚡️ Garmin R50 Launch Monitor Review ➡️ https://youtu.be/KHIaRBma5oA
=============================
Products and Gear Mentioned in this Video
=============================
Square Golf Launch Monitor ➡️ https://www.playbetter.com/products/square-golf-simulator-launch-monitor?_pos=1&_sid=ebd860122&_ss=r&ghref=11569%3A660481
FlightScope MEVO+ ➡️ https://www.playbetter.com/products/flightscope-mevo-plus-portable-personal-golf-launch-monitor?_pos=1&_sid=1b17589f0&_ss=r&variant=42274060599461&ghref=11569%3A660481
⭐️ Use Code “GOLFICITY” to get the best price!
===========================
Connect with us!
=============================
IG: ➡︎ https://instagram.com/golficity
FB: ➡︎ https://facebook.com/golficity
Tik Tok: ➡︎ https://www.tiktok.com/@golficity
🤝 Join Our Community
No Bad Days Golf Society ➡️ https://www.nobaddaysgolfsociety.com/
⏰ Timecodes ⏰
0:00 – Intro
1:07 – Square Golf Launch Monitor Features Overview
2:28 – How to Get Club Data with the Square Golf Launch Monitor
3:25 – Setting Up Our Square Golf Launch Monitor Accuracy Test
6:07 – Square Golf Club Data Accuracy Test for Irons
11:37 – Square Golf Club Data Accuracy Test for Wedges
16:53 – Square Golf Club Data Accuracy Test for Driver
19:56 – Breaking Down the Square Golf Club Data Numbers
23:52 – Final Thoughts
===========================
#golf #golfswing #golfer #golflife #golfsimulator #simulator #golfequipment
25 Comments
Two suggestions for you. 1). You have the Mevo plus setup incorrectly by having a “valley” in between the unit and the ball. Setup allows for a single step up or a flush surface. Fix that and you may see better club data from the mevo plus. 2). Add a metallic sticker to the balls for the mevo and you will get accurate ball data for the mevo while using the square golf balls (assuming it won’t interfere with the square launch monitor).
Trægulv kan få få den monitor til at hopppe, når han bruger et jern
The small differences in swing path and face angle can be explained by a 1 degree difference in alignment of the two units.
not sure why use the mevo+ as the baseline, as it's not a gold standard product as say a GCQuad or GC3 would've been
For price and data u get… its a no brainer… SQure get the win against mevo or skytrak + . easily and wins about miles. SquareLM just nailed it. witha ll data u get and the credit system i think its amazing.
Someone recently, cannot remember the video, explained that different lunch monitors take a snap shot and measure at different points. e.g. for path measurement: some are based on where the ball is physically hit and when hit, whereas, another is based on the geometric centre of the club face ( such as the middle of a driver) at the time of maximum ball compression. Obviously the way they measure other club data e.g. dots on face, with different location for each one also has an impact on when the measurement is taken. There could also be an issue based on the accuracy of how the stickers are added. e.g. if square is using the shaft stickers to measure angle of attack and they have not been placed on at a pure 90 degree angle there was be difference or inaccuracies. Impact location can also effect the measurements. It would be interesting to know how and when the square takes the measurements. Square calculates face angle and Dynamic loft. It only measures Path and angle of attack so it is the calculations that are off for Dynamic loft.
First off, great video. A lot of what you are saying is very true and you make some good points.
But one thing that I think was missed was how big of a difference a few degrees is in regards to swing path and face angle.
A few degrees change in those metrics can be the difference between a playable draw or an OB slice, but hopefully as they keep doing updates this will only get better and better
Any chance the infrared off the square is interrupting the Doppler on the Mevo+?
What a stupid test . You are using a shit device to test another shitty device ( I mean that compared to a real LM like a GCquad etc ) No one have ever talked about the great accuracy of the mevo . Waste of time
That dynamic loft could be low because the reference point is on the shaft?
Are y’all going to be at the PGA show this year?
I know there’s no standard for dynamic loft because we have different swings and different levels of compression, it shouldn’t just be a couple of degrees. From what I’ve been told it should be around 70% of static loft. For instance in your 48 degree, with good swing path and good shaft lean it would take your static 48 to around 34 degrees dynamic.
should give that square to canadian veteran?
Any updates on Square having better ball options (like Prov1 or Chrome premium) ?
Nervous about stickers. Lol. Where do I even begin unpacking this?
For starters, anyone nervous about stickers is the exact type of person I’d gladly play for money. Because they’re likely not very good.
And if you’re worried about stickers, better not ever try regripping your clubs. First you have to use a utility knife. 😱 And if you manage to not ruin your shaft, you’ll be shocked at how much sticky tape is under the grip.
Are there no capable men in this world anymore with even the most basic DIY skills? I mean, didn’t your brand new club come with stickers on the shaft from the MFG? Did you just leave those oem ones on there because you’re stumped at how to remove them. If so, here’s a pro tip. Grab a heat gun. Oh wait, if you need someone to explain this, I doubt you have a heat gun. So, go grab your wife’s hair dryer. Heat up the sticker and pull it off. Done.
FFS.
Can a covered range bay count as indoor? like, is it a question of the sun hitting it directly, or is outdoor ambient light bad too?
Guys, you have set up the M+ the wrong may. It should be a flat surface from radar unit to ball as stated in their manual. To compensate for your height difference, there is a setting in the Flighscope app where you can add the surface height, which should be the height of your hitting area relative to the unit.
Not sure if this is the issue but these lower end units often still use ball data for some club data calculations. Again not sure if that is the case but the Mevo could be giving bad dynamic loft because it isn’t getting good ball data to help calculate dynamic loft via some kind of algorithm that uses spin as an input.
Dynamic Loft has to be a guess for both units given the MEVO can;t see it and the sticker has nothing to do with the face so I have to guess that the dynamic loft on the Square is tied to vertices launch and I think the black surface is an issue
What is the point of comparing the SQUARE with something that you did not think was very good can’t tell who is right or wrong
Quit raising the price of square golf through talking about you influencing fucks!
Skip to 1 hour in for this guy to get to the point
The square definitely has my interest i currently have the mevo + and do like it but have a lot of problems with miss reads putting and chipping is impossible but my sim setup is in my garage which is all metal 😂😂
I think that what you did on that 8 iron trying to work the loft pretty much told you the Mevo was WAY OFF on the dynamic loft. Love the video, though. Very helpful. I'm definitely getting me a Square Launch Monitor!
But how can a Doppler radar unit see exactly club datas? I would
Assume it just calculate from the ball flight, number approximations with physics models… the square should instead see exactly the face