Today Dean Saunders takes a look at the Taylormade Qi35 driver for 2025 and takes look with Trackman at the numbers to see if it can beat his own Stealth with the same spec setup!
►Subscribe @AFGOLFSTORE
►Visit Us – www.afgolfstore.co.uk
► Hit #Subscribe & #HitTheBell so you don’t miss out on any new content!
———————————————————————————–
►Links:
Facebook ► / afgolfstore
Instagram ► @afgolfstore
Web ► http://www.afgolfstore.co.uk
———————————————————————————
#golf #golfgear #golfer #golfswing #golfsmarter #professionalgolfer #golfprecision #taylormade #driver #comparison #headtohead #review #golfclubs #qi35 #stealth
Initial Impressions of the QI35
Once on the range, I took a moment to appreciate the aesthetics of the QI35. Transitioning from the dark head of my Stealth to the lighter grey finish of the QI35 felt refreshing. The new driver looks aggressive and sleek, a true testament to modern golf club design. But looks alone won’t make it a winner; performance is key.
First Shots with the QI35
As I struck my first few shots, I immediately noticed a difference. The QI35 felt faster, and the ball flight was distinctively different. I was hitting it with the same shaft as my Stealth, which made it easier to compare. The feel was noticeably stronger off the face, and the ball seemed to launch with more authority. However, the real test would be in the numbers.
Comparing Trackman Numbers
After hitting ten shots with both drivers, I turned to the Trackman data to see how they compared. My original Stealth averaged a carry distance of 244 yards, while the QI35 clocked in at an impressive 255 yards. Total distance showed a similar trend: 261.4 yards for the Stealth versus 277 yards for the QI35. These figures were quite compelling.
Spin Rates and Ball Speed
One of the most interesting aspects of my findings was the spin rates. The highest spin rate I recorded with the QI35 was 3,400 rpm, while my Stealth averaged around 2,900 rpm. Interestingly, even with a lower strike on the face, the QI35 maintained a respectable ball speed of 153 mph. The fact that it didn’t balloon on misses was a huge plus, indicating better control over the trajectory.
Strike Location and Consistency
Looking closely at strike locations, I noticed that I was consistently hitting the QI35 lower on the face compared to the Stealth. This was crucial, as it provided insights into how the driver performs when strikes aren’t ideal. Despite hitting lower on the clubface, the QI35 still yielded impressive numbers, proving its forgiveness.
Feedback and Feel
In terms of feel, the QI35 certainly felt more solid than my Stealth. I couldn’t help but think about how valuable the data from Trackman was, especially considering how fitting used to be more of an art than a science before such technology came along. The QI35’s ability to maintain performance even with less-than-ideal strikes was a major takeaway for me.
Final Thoughts on the QI35
Reflecting on my experience, I can confidently say that the QI35 has impressed me. The numbers don’t lie; it’s longer and seems to provide more distance and forgiveness than my trusty Stealth. That being said, I want to dive deeper into the fitting process to see how much more I can get out of this driver. It might just be time for a more in-depth fitting session.
Looking Ahead
As we approach the new season, I’m excited to continue testing the TaylorMade range, including short game and putting equipment. I’ll be sharing my honest opinions and insights as I put these clubs through their paces on the course.
2 Comments
Excellent and fair test Dean! Get it in the bag 🎉
Great review legend. Love that 👍