8 Comments

  1. The one thing I always believed about the Hall of Fame is that if a player's candidacy needs to be justified by finding comparable careers, that player is not a Hall of Famer.if you are a Hall of Famer, its a no doubter. There is no discussion because your career speaks for itself and it obvious to fans, media, peers, and other all-time greats.

  2. Gotta take your word for many of these older era players. Basically if I don't recognize the name then they're not undeniably in or out for me. Like you I'm more informed about the mid/late 70's and on.

  3. Where is the video at for Giannis and the bucks underachieving once again

    Also I send out a email about a potential interview and you haven’t responded

  4. Thanks man, great subject.. it often annoyes me how inconsistent HOF election seems to be.
    Honestly, we also seen MVP's, finals MVP's, all team selections all sorts of things given to wrong players over the years leading to (in otdays hostile debates) a lot of wrong outcomes and perceptions due to people using these accoldaes and stats and HOF status in debate.

  5. I feel like if ur team had to prepare for a player, that player is probably a HOF. Ie Lenny Wilkins, Bob Love, the twins( forget names), Nate etc

Write A Comment