Difference Between Pep Guardiola And Sir Alex Ferguson

Music:
“Carpe Noctem” by Masara

#shorts #story #realmadrid #leomessi #messi #barcelona #fcbarcelona #goat #cr7 #cristianoronaldo #cristiano #thierryhenry #henry #beckham

Speaker: Gerard Pique

Absolutely no copyright infringement is intended. All audio and video clips are the sole property of their respective owners. This is only clipped for entertainment.

Source:
Gerard Pique On Messi, Sir Alex Ferguson & Pep Guardiola | Barcelona To Kings League Ft Harry Pinero

44 Comments

  1. No wonder United is struggling because they are looking for a manager that can do what Sir Alex did at the club. Being a coach of a big club is tough but I can’t imagine having to manage the day to day activities that’s an impossible task for anyone. Pep’s job in City is tough but not impossible to be done as City have abundant of resources that literally can make the entire operation looking like a clockwork.

  2. Pep is responsible for the most attractive soccer of all time, SAF was winning titles with John O’Shea, Wes Brown, and Park Ji Sung. Hard to compare the two, totally different advantages and disadvantages. Head to head, Pep had the best midfield of all time with the best player of all time, which was really the difference. Darren Fletcher vs Iniesta not really gonna work.

  3. Another difference is pep took over teams that had recent success and made them better, Sir Alex completely rebuilt utd and Aberdeen.

  4. No wonder why SAF shake his hands to see Man United defeat and down fall, SAF is the brain of Man United.

  5. Yeah I can see why united fell apart after Fergie, guy managed the club, not just the team, basically took the structural backbone with him when he retired. Not his fault, if anything the club should've foreseen this and brought in guys to shadow and learn the non-tactical side of what Fergie did.

  6. Im not saying Pep isnt great
    But if you give those teams and money almost any coach would do about the same if not more

  7. Well traditions managers at least in football don't need to manage every aspect, which is a big flaw in the system imo and being overworked is not a strong point but it is a very impressive one. The thing is Peps clubs haven't ever needed that. City for example have enough assets and resources that wouldn't borther the manager same thing for barca. Uniteds biggest flaw was the sole dependence of the great saf. He was like a singular bolt trying to keep a crane stable.

  8. Klopp was performing a similar role with liverpool as SAF did with Manu…it will be interesting to see whether liverpool willgo down the same path or not

  9. SAF did the work of about 5 people. Man United needed to completely overhaul the structure of the club when he left rather than just randomly hiring managers and choosing players at random.

  10. This is why anyone coming in after SAF (even if it was Pep) was doomed to fail. Sir Alex was both the manager, coach, technical director, sporting director, academy director – all in one. Man was exceptional.

    This is why every manager after him struggled. It is too much to handle. Ineos is fixing that now; it will take time though.

  11. Sir Alex picked United up from the dirt ans built the team using youth. He gave us Becks, Giggs and Neville

  12. ‘Sir Alex was more than a coach. He was controlling the whole club.’ This explains A LOT. Thanks Pique.

  13. And right now pep is getting shown to be the fraud he is when he doesn’t have a world class player in every position his team fucking sucks

  14. Patrica Evra once said he is not afraid of SAF but he is afraid to disappoint SAF. We can clearly see SAF being a father figure had successfully helped him to get the best of his players

  15. That's why you don't just f*ck around and replace chaps like Fergie. You constantly remind and motivate them to have at least five proteges under their wings during the latter years of their tenure – then you let him pick exactly who is most suitable of the five.

    Anything short spells the disaster Man-U has become.

  16. That’s why Man U is nowhere near as good as they were. Teams like Real Madrid or Barcelona, the owners or presidents understands football, so they only need a good coach. But Man U’s owners are better businessmen than football person, so they need a real manager to oversees the football side. Yet, Man U owners now don’t want to give that many rights like transfers or facilities to a manager anymore. If you give time to Mourinho, Louis Van Gaal or maybe even Rangnick, Man U might have a better results.

Write A Comment