Kane Cornes and David King go HEAD-TO-HEAD on all the pressing AFL issues, only on SEN!
0:00 Selection of talls
5:00 The state of tackling
11:46 In The Gun
18:08 The Friday Agenda
#afl
Related Posts
Kane Cornes and David King go HEAD-TO-HEAD on all the pressing AFL issues, only on SEN!
0:00 Selection of talls
5:00 The state of tackling
11:46 In The Gun
18:08 The Friday Agenda
#afl
26 Comments
So according to Andrew Einstein Dillon, if a player's action causes another to be concussed it IS a reportable offence. I wonder how the AFL would deal with such a situation if the concussion resulted from a knee to the head while the "offending" player was in the process of taking Mark of the Year.
David King is a footy muppet. Every player can have a bad game . Thats why its called a game . Some times you win , sometimes you lose !
The Bont got tagged two weeks ago and moved forward. What are you talking about!
So if the MRO adjudicates on concussion as the outcome and not the action, does that mean that Marshall, who legitimately jostled for the ball with Paddy McCartin, should have been reported. What would happen with a similar incident with today's interpretation?
How many weeks in a row can David King call Sean Darcy Sam Darcy. They can't even remember names yet they're so opinionated. Always gets names wrong it's ridiculous
The problem with outcome over action is the history of the player doesn't play a role, Bedford's tackle on a player that's never suffered a concussion probably has a different outcome
Kane Cornes using Fremantles loss to Hawthorn as an argument against Darcy & Jackson is hilarious.
They lost in the midfield BECAUSE Darcy & Jackson weren’t both playing.
The question is who is a smater coach sam or pies coach? Pies coach playing games saying we hope they play finn as we can just move nick forward! But your problem pies is no nick dominating no pies! Just because finn has been named does not mean he plays! Pies wont no till 1 hour before game starts! Hope pies have a better plan b moving nick forward as if that does happen it means hawks are winning the midfield battle and that will be game over! The smartest coach wins this game! See if im wrong!!!
Why would Freo trade and A grade defender for draft picks when we already have a great hand this year and are trying to push for a flag? That's the opposite of what we are trying to do. We wanna trade out the picks for ready made A graders to come in. Usually Kane is pretty smart but that's an odd idea.
I love these two when they disagree, so respectful to each other while in totally disagreement. But it's actually kinda funny 🤣
I dont believe Macrae is saying Daicos + the team will spend all their energy trying to eleviate the tag, he's saying bring it on, so I don't know what Kingy means by saying Naicos needs to prove himself by playing better than the tagger, he most certainly will play through his skin tagger or not. Hawks can worry about Daicos and the pies can worry about winning the game
With Kane on this one
So if a player charges into a pack and his shoulder collides with another player's head who gets knocked out then that player would get reported for reckless action, head high, high impact even if it was a team mate ?
im not a collingwood fan but the daicos call was a bit off target, lachie neil cant shake a tag and is next to useless when he is being tagged same thing for oliver and both of those have far better mids around them
The problem for Nick is he really is our only centre clearance player at the moment. We need Pendles, De Goey (and Mitchell when he returns) to ease the burden so opposition teams are competing against more than one dangerous mid.
Daicos overated player
Adelaide's issues is the midfield and ruck especially when laird at centre bounces and O'brian in infective at best. Smith is our only liability down back and massive at that.
lol Kingy, there is no way Daicos wins the brownlow this year , won't even come close unless by some miracle the Pies win the next 6 and he gets 3 every game !
Another load of gossip. Really no insight. What about some research, or an interview with an expert, something, instead of the same rehash.
Kane doesn't seem to 100% grasp why the two players got off on appeal. The appeals board made no judgement on whether the tackles were legal, they simply were not convinced that the AFL were able to satisfy all components of what constitutes a dangerous tackle in their arguments
My god. You have to be miserable to make Kane Cornes look cheerful and reasonable.
Dillon is a disaster, has been since day 1.. AFL media needs to call him out..
David King makes Kane look like the best AFL pundit going around . Kane must have got the short straw having to put up with this flog
Pendlebury on Cripps is a stupid comparison for the Daicos tag
McCartney's son may be not be even be eligible for the GWS academy depending on what part of Sydney the family lives in. I doubt very many AFL players and high level staff actually live in the GWS zone in western sydney. The Giants home ground itself is right on the eastern boundary of their academy zone
Let's do the maths: there are around 120 tackles a match; 9 matches a round; 18 rounds = 19440. 6 players before this weekend had done time for dangerous tackles.
6/19440 = it is entirely IRRATIONAL to pretend this is the start of a slippery slope
"imagine cox" ~ Kane Cornes 2024.