In this video we analyze four NBA trade proposals made by Bleacher Report that are still about to go down throughout the NBA offseason… Lauri Markkanen, Julius Randle and more discussed

BR Article – https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10128467-5-blockbuster-nba-trade-ideas-moves-for-markkanen-ingram-lavine-more

BUSINESS – partnerships@manatalentgroup.com

Degeneracy Picks – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOGG7EgfTXJiRz5QnO59wPg

MERCHANDISE – https://hoopsreference.store

SUPPORT ON PATREON – https://www.patreon.com/hoopsreference

SEATGEEK CODE: hoopsreference ($20 off your first purchase at seatgeek.com)

FOLLOW ON TWITTER – https://twitter.com/HoopsReference

FOLLOW ON INSTAGRAM – https://www.instagram.com/jdhoopsrefererence

Welcome to the Hoops Reference YouTube Channel! Subscribe for all things NBA content! Multiple new video every week. Leave a like if you enjoyed what you saw! Thanks for watching!

#nba #basketball

27 Comments

  1. Haven't even finished the video and that first Markkanen trade is hilarious. Hawks are retooling first off, and most importantly, they currently have a log jam at the wing spot. They are literally one of the only teams who wouldn't be looking to trade for Markkanen given how valuable the wing position is in the league rn.

  2. If anything, Lauri to Mavs would make a better deal. I mean they will be top heavy a little bit, but the play style of Lauri fits so well with Luka and Kyrie. He's not a DPOY candidate but he's a better defender than Randle. And besides Randle's play style is a little incompatible with the roster that the Mavs have esp during defensive possessions. Lastly, Randle is too streaky for what the Mavs need.

  3. The randle trade is super unrealistic. Your giving up a 24/9/5 guy for worse players. This trade makes no sense at all. Knicks should keep randle by all means. He’s their second option in scoring and if we traded randle in this case it would be bad since it would only be Brunson mainly scoring. This trade makes no sense for the Knicks, not even a first round pick too. A definite lose for the Knicks. Its also a weird fir for the mavs since randle needs the ball more and your sharing the ball with luka and Kyrie? It won’t work well.

  4. Whoever thinks randle is good for the mavs in exchange for pj and gaffy knows nothing about the mavs 😂

  5. Randle is better than Pj Washington and gafford and Better than keener and Powell put Together the Mavs would win this trade

  6. The Knicks will keep their dollar rather than trade it for four quarters or anything less. Let’s go Knicks.

  7. Brandon Ingram to the Bucks makes sense. Middleton is always hurt. They need a younger replacement that is more reliable

  8. Randle lacks defensive skills and is too injury-prone. If they're willing to take Kleber and Powell along with a couple of second-round picks, then go for it. Otherwise, we should pass on this opportunity. We need reliable players who can contribute consistently on both ends of the floor, and Randle just doesn't fit that profile.

  9. As a Magic fan, i hate that Garland trade. Suggs is a really good fit and hes so young, Suggs is a top tier perimeter defender and defense is our calling card

  10. If Knicks took super dwight and lay-up line maxi misalot then added 2 first round picks might think about it but probably still say no.

  11. Randle will never give you a full season. Too many injuries. And when he got to the playoffs with the knicks, he was a total bust!

  12. I hate that everyone in the comments is hating on the Randle trade from the mavs perspective while not also recognizing it’s bad from the Knicks perspective. We trade an all nba player for a pj Washington who also played worse in the playoffs/ finals and Daniel gafford who was largely unplayable against the celtics

Write A Comment