Simon Jordan BLASTS The Premier League For ‘ABSURD’ Decision To Charge Man City With 115 Charges! 😠

Do Man City’s charges impact their success? talkSPORT’s Jim White, Simon Jordan and Martin Keown discuss!

Subscribe: https://youtube.com/c/talkSPORT

Enjoyed this YouTube video? 😍

🖥️ talkSPORT’s Website: https://talksport.com/
📲 talkSPORT’s Twitter: https://twitter.com/talkSPORT
📷 talkSPORT’s Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/talksport/?hl=en
👤 talkSPORT’s Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/talkSPORT/
📱 talkSPORT’s Tik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@talksport?

🔴 Download the talkSPORT app HERE! – https://talksport.com/apps/

🔎 Want to see if you feature on our YouTube channel? Check out our Best talkSPORT callers playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLFVMnSsi_04LGLa9pS9xDv__me-Gjmlu2

#mancity
#mcfc
#talkSPORT
#PremierLeague

um we are saluting Manchester City of course we are we’ be wrong not to this morning because um they’ve done it again six titles in seven years and the first side to win four in a row so Manchester City Pep and the rest we salute what you’ve done but there’s a butt there’s always a butt isn’t there with those charges hanging over them Ying Klo and we’ll do more in Klo before we go today but ygen klopp as he as he approached his final game and the final game came and went and they beat wolves and now klopp goes but he’s left us with these words klopp says everybody knows that there’s a case of 115 charges I have no clue what that means but this is really important whatever happened at City Pep is the best manager in the world put any other manager in the world at that club they do not win the league four times in a row he says and then klopp says this does that mean they can do what they want of course not but I do not know what they did or if they did anything and I’m not here to say anything I would like to know one day but I’ll be somewhere else what do you make of that well can I be honest he knows precisely what they’ve done because he can read the same way everyone else has can they’ve been accused of misrepresenting commercial sponsorship um sorry Equity as commercial sponsorship inflating deals to be able to meet the holes in their finances to be able to comply Financial fair play knows full well what they’ve done the the issue is does he believe that they’re guilty or not believe that they’re guilty and he can’t answer that question because he doesn’t want to find himself in a cleft position they’ve been found guilty by UEFA they then went to court of arbitration and sports the case turns on a variety of things one of them was about time borrowing about evidence that couldn’t be submitted another was about the complicitness of people being able to tell things to the court of arbitration sport that they couldn’t possibly want to lie about um and subsequently the court of arbitration sport saying these people very influential positions would have to be part of a conspiracy theory well that’s how conspiracy theories work that’s why Enron no longer exists and businesses like that because of conspiracy theories that’s why we’ve had the situations inside the post office so this idea that conspiracy theories can’t exist and people would tell untruths in hearings is preposterous but right now under the Premier League rules the the the the Man City situation is they aren’t guilty but KS is kind of riddle me this riddle me that I I I don’t understand what he’s trying to say I I don’t necessarily agree with him I think well he’s been asked to say something isn’t he I I think he shows um a great deal of professional respect to pep but he wants he want but he wants the outcome of these charges to be heard because he he feels that you know look if this is financial doping that we’re talking about and then what does that AC what do you acquire with that extra Finance what are the players you know was it was it a de bruyne was it an Aguero was it Aguero probably at the club at the early point or was it or was it was it they spent too much money on other players that they might not have spent so much money on you know I think you have to hold your hand and say what they done with each season that Manchester City lift a premier league title the elephant in the room gets bigger if you get the imagery of it if you know what I mean I do they want to clear their name but it’s also interesting we make a lot first of all I think it’s absolutely absurd that the Premier League have laid 115 charges at the door if they wanted this to stick right they should have focused on 10 big charges and gone after them for that right there’s 115 charges most of them are duplicated by the very nature of repeating the same financial information over a period of years so if you’ve misrepresented in 2013 and you continue to carry that forward on your balance sheet in 2014 you’ll be charged again for the same offense so when you look at those 115 charges some of them are really innocuous some of them are really irrelevant and there’s probably about five to 10 charges on there that have any relevance so the 115 looks like a great big stick they’re that bad they’ve been charged 115 times it’s not that that’s not what it is but does Richard masters of the Premier League help the situation in any way when he says all we have said is that a date has been set for the hearing we haven’t said when that is a rule boot requires these commissions to be held in private and everything to be confidential well that’s great you’re keeping it to yourself and you won’t tell us anythings the time scale but why is that why would he do that because who sets the rules for the clubs to adhere to the clubs the when wolves want to change the rules they bring forward a motion to suggest that they want to get rid of v it gets voted on if the clubs didn’t want transparency or do want transparency they are perfectly able to get a 14 to6 majority and vote through but they don’t so look don’t look at Masters he is just a bag carrier he’s the person that administrates the Premier League under the aices of The Wishes of the 20 member clubs he not just a bad carrier he’s a top man at the Premier League well metaphorically he’s a bad carrier because he’s administering he’s a face of the Premier League he’s administering what so Richard Mar says my bag Richard Richard Marcus says I want this and 14 clubs go s off you’re not having it what does Richard marus do carries their bag for them right that’s the very definition of a bag carrier so whilst he’s there to uphold the principles uphold the disciplines and be commercially and economically sensible he is operating under the office of what 20 member clubs want him to do yeah he to their tune couple of people at Wembley over the weekend Simon took me to one side and wanted to talk to me about City 115 charges now of course there’s only so much that we know you know more than most actually to be fair you Simon logically the hund in your in your mind do you see the 115 being pruned right down to about 15 or 20 I just said it and if so when well the the issue is not necessarily when it’s why it’s taking so long and you have to look at Manchester City okay for that process because Manchester City have argued about the makeup of the P of the panel they didn’t want an Arsenal supporting Advocate amongst the prosecuting or the the independent panel that we’re going to be adjudicating so there’s a lot of process the Premier League by taking this action are damned if they do damned if they don’t if they bring this action against Man City and they’re successful everyone goes you’ve got a corrupt League that’s you’ve been complient allowing a football club to commit fraud if they didn’t bring the prosecution everyone would say well what are you doing why didn’t you do that their job is defying Justice no well they absolutely But the irony of it is if you look going off on a piece here but you look at the incidental information that we got around us Chelsea for example in 2004 when there’s no Financial fair play did precisely what they wanted right broke the system well under no governance and here we are 20 years later with Chelsea looking at what happened to Man City and going how do we get around this we’ll sell assets to get around it we’ll sell hotels so Chelsea have got a double wh me they’ able to break the economic model in 2004 and almost destroy the landscape of financial regulation or thought processes that had any kind of sense attached to it and here they are finding another way around it with all due respect to Chelsea and they’re not suggesting they doing anything wrong and maybe if Man City had seen this coming they’ have gone tell you what we’ll do we’ll Buy Manchester City and we’ll load it into a structure that’s got loads of assets CU we know what’s happening in football but they didn’t have the money capab they but that doesn’t alter the fact that I genuinely believe whether Man City fans like it or not I do think they have a case to answer a grownup proper case now whether that can be can stick or whether my overriding suspicion is that there will be a settlement of some shape or description okay which is what I think will happen well this Monday morning Manchester City innocent until proven guilty until proven otherwise um but Manchester City also insists all along that uh when it comes to it they will clear their name this Jim White Simon Jordan Martin Keon and we’re at 11 Jim White and Simon Jordan Monday to Friday mornings from 10: on a.m On Da via the talk sport app and on your smart speaker talk sport