So Rory mroy said that the golf ball roll back is not actually going to cost that much yardage like five to seven yards right elaborate on that I I think you know I’m a huge not Rory fan I opposite of a huge Rory fan opposite I’d hate all the things he says but

Elaborate on on that is he wrong I think he is one because it’s frustrating how they’re testing these balls so they’re on a robot swinging the swing speed I think they upped it to like 120 120 something miles but that’s a robot he’s going to hit it Square every single time that’s costing

That robot five or seven yards what happens when joeo or Tate is hitting toe balls out on the course that’s going to cost me 15 to to 25 yards I think when you h a rocket one for sure that’s 15 to 7 yards when you sweet spot it

9 Comments

  1. Is this just for premium golf balls like tp5s and pro v1s or is it going to affect brands like Wilson chaos or the Kirkland type brands

  2. Truly a stupid take .. you admit the average player is inconsistent …. The difference is minimal. How about leave the commentary to those who have a clue what they’re talking about … oh and that ain’t you two.

  3. Yeah the USGA numbers are blatantly false. Keegan Bradley did testing with a model of the rolled back ball and he said he lost 40-50 yards. Lucas Glover was interviewed after his round a few weeks ago and he did his own testing and said the distance loss was significant. Totally agree about Rory. He has a great swing but he always says really dumb things and he acted like a tool bag in the Ryder Cup

Write A Comment