Fitness training is important for becoming a better hockey player, but fitness testing means next to nothing about how good a player is.

Connor Bedard put up average results (except in pull-ups where he crushed), but he is still a generational prospect because of what he can do on the ice.

20 Comments

  1. That’s why I like hockey and football ⚽️ because it’s focused on skill rather than just how gifted you are with genetics

  2. Isolating a muscel is one thing but not a goal in itself, you must look at the total package. Gretzky, Lemieux, Jagr or evem McDavid are far from being the strongest guys on the ice, but they are still the best when it comes to playing hockey.

  3. I always thought this about other sports combines were pointless. You go thru all these workouts that really don’t tell you anything about the player.

  4. one of my professors who supervised some combines said it probably makes sense to treat it like a physical that needs to be passed rather than benchmarking/ranking, ie if a prospect can't broad jump/bench over X then there might be cause for concern

  5. I know it's sarcasm but im like bro Mcdavid is just a decent player, Really? 😂😂😂

  6. Everyone needs to shut the fuck up about this kid… Let him play. If half way into the season he is good or bad… Then bring it up

  7. The combine has never pretended to be a scouting report or represents how good a player is. Its just a way for teams to get additional data.

Write A Comment