It's not easy for serve bots to win Grand Slams, and Roland Garros' clay surface makes it even the most difficult to achieve it, as it's the one with the most break chances. Kevin Anderson has made two Grand Slam finals, but the truth is that his game went beyond just a cannonball serve.
What kind of nonsense is this? Isner KNOWS that Opelka has zero chance, so why is he even asking this question? And then laughs at the answer as if it's not the only answer Opelka can realistically give.
24 Comments
It's not easy for serve bots to win Grand Slams, and Roland Garros' clay surface makes it even the most difficult to achieve it, as it's the one with the most break chances. Kevin Anderson has made two Grand Slam finals, but the truth is that his game went beyond just a cannonball serve.
I love Navoneπ€£
If everyone defaults, then 1%
I mean thatβs zero confidents and maybe the problem.
What kind of nonsense is this? Isner KNOWS that Opelka has zero chance, so why is he even asking this question? And then laughs at the answer as if it's not the only answer Opelka can realistically give.
this is a zen answer
Just to be in the ATP is a major accomplishment in life.
π
1% is the walkthrough chance
Thats what all US players lacks the mentality
With this mentality and evolution he won't win even Challanger…
Clay doesn't give a very big advantage for big servers…
Looks zero chemistry right there
Legend, great guy , enjoying his tennis ππ
Dayumn..Isner looking old ..
I know no one escapes age but still.
What's impossible to envision is impossible to achieve
He is beyond trash . This guy is all serve , nothing at all after that .
I mean…its definitely Zero. Reilly knows, we all know
Navone is a well known player so the fact Opelka didnβt know him says more about him
More interviews like this please tennis.
And he lost against Navone in straight sets. π
All ametican tennis pleyers have zero options in RG.π€
Love you
Navone sucks
Is that John Isner?