Trackman 4: Incredible Tech, But Is It Worth $20K+?
It’s one of the most expensive pieces of gov tech you can buy. But is the Trackman 4 really worth the price? And more importantly, who is it actually built for? Today, we’re going to break down what Trackman 4 does very well, where it struggles, and how it compares against rivals like the GC Quad or the Trackman IO. Stick with us to the end. You’ll know exactly who should buy this launch monitor and who should skip it. A quick heads up, our Golf website has three free tools to help you find the launch monitor that best fits your needs. Use our filter tool to instantly find monitors with the exact features you want, like built-in display, for example, and it’ll show you which launch monitors have that feature. Click the compare button to compare up to four launch monitors side by side in our comparison tool, where you can see every feature at a glance. If you’re still unsure, answer some questions in our quiz tool and get a personalized launch monitor recommendation based on your answers. All tools are linked in the description. Now, back to the video. Let’s start with the biggest question. Where does Trackman 4 actually excel? Well, it is the leading launch monitor outdoors. If you’re in sunlight, wind, rain, real playing conditions, Trackman’s radar tracking technology is going to give you the most accurate ball flight on the market. The carry distance matches reality. You have the ability to use it anywhere from the driving range or on the course. There is a reason the PGA is using Trackman’s tech in their tournaments because it is the best. Indoors, it’s a different story. You need a minimum of 16 ft from the unit to the screen plus some buffer feet behind the screen. If you don’t have that space, you can’t use Trackman 4. Even if you do, the radar can sometimes exaggerate spin or carry unless you really dial in the setup. So outdoors, top of the range, indoors, it takes work, and we’ll talk about that in the setup section next. Why does it take more work indoors? Because Trackman 4 needs very specific setup conditions to perform at its best. It’s not plugandplay like a GC quad. You need the right environment. So, the lighting is critical because Trackman combines radar and cameras. You need a ceiling spotlight indoors or strong panel lights to capture the impact data cleanly. Without it, your spin numbers, they won’t be reliable. And the same goes for golf balls. Unless you use RCT balls, Trackband has to estimate spin. So, they’ll be shown as italics on screen, and those estimates can be way off. With RCT balls, you do get true measured spin, which means more realistic carry distances, but it’s an extra expense having to get these RCT balls, which are more expensive. Calibration is also part of the process. You have autotargeting, which makes it easier, but if you want perfect alignment, you’ll be spending some time fine-tuning it. On the plus side, outdoors, Trackmans, motorized feet, they autole the unit, which saves time. But indoors setup is more demanding than most camerabased systems, and that’s something home users need to know. Now, one of the main reasons pros and coaches swear by Trackman is because of that sheer depth of data metrics. So, on ball flight, you get everything. Speed launch, spin axis. You get the full picture. On the club side, it’s going even deeper. You have attack angle, dynamic loft, face the path, swing direction. So, that level of insight helps explain not just what the ball did, but why. And if you compare it to GC Quads, Trackman 4’s biggest competitor at this tier, it simply provides more metrics when you line up the data categories. side by side. It can’t really compete with Trackman here. The impact location tool, it shows a dot on the club face where you made contact, so you can instantly see if a miss came from striking off the toe or heel. So, if you’re working on your strike consistency, it’s really helpful tool. And then there’s putting. So, Trackman captures more putting metrics than any other launch monitor. Things like skid distance, roll percentage, tempo, effective green speed, you’re not getting any of this on any other launch monitor right now. The deeper benefit with these metrics is confidence. So every number connects cause and effect so you know your swing changes are working instead of just hoping they are. But the numbers alone they won’t make you better. It’s how you use them and that’s where Track Band’s software delivers because the virtual courses are definitely one of their biggest indoor strengths. You can see the rendering quality here is superb and every hole feels like you’re standing there. The ball physics are tuned to match what you’d expect outside so fades and draws are reacting naturally. And there’s plenty of golfers who choose Trackman over other sims for this reason alone. The realism has a depth you just don’t see on the rivals. And in terms of overall gameplay, it does feel more authentic to us than GS Pro. GS Pro is still easier to use and has a larger online community, but for immersion and course detail, we think Trackman has the edge. On top of that, you have custom range mode that lets you recreate problem shots like an uphill carry or tight fairway. So instead of just mindlessly hitting balls, you can practice the exact shots that cost you strokes. And then you have the performance center which uses strokes gained analysis to compare you against probenchmarks. So it doesn’t just say you’re inconsistent. It’s going to show you exactly where you’re losing shots off the tea with wedges or on a pro shots so you know what to fix first. Now the test center builds skill tests and group shots by club. That means if you’re working on a swing change, you can actually prove it’s paying off with data instead of just guessing. And with the shot analysis feature, you get AI motion analysis. So that’s going to automatically detect swing checkpoints like your shaft plane or lag angle without you needing to draw lines. So the payoff here is efficiency. By detecting those checkpoints for you, you’re saving hours of trial and error and just keeps your practice focused on making the right changes. Now, you will need to connect external cameras like your iPhone to get this feature. But the key thing for all these features and these practice modes, they’re connected back to lowering your scores, which keeps you motivated to come back instead of just drifting into aimless range sessions. Trackman does include some fun mini games like Bullseye or Captured Flag if you want more casual practice with your friends. You can also join some online leagues or the next golf tour, which is a global indoor tournament with prize money. But there is a limitation that stings for some golfers is the Track14 doesn’t support GSP Pro. So there is some legal disputes between the companies which means you can’t connect with that GS Pro community which matters because GSP Pro players can play with friends on dozens of other launch monitors. But with Trackman you’re locked into that ecosystem which is far smaller than the GS Pro community. Now talking price, it’s not just the hardware cost that you’re looking at. You have an indoor only version of the Trackon 4 which lets you play only indoors. That’s going to cost you around $22,000 495 right now with the full indoor and outdoor version costing around $254.95 at the moment. But whatever version you choose, there’s also an ongoing subscription fee to keep the software access going and that’s $1,100 right now per year. So yeah, this is premium pricing and it does matter when we’re comparing it to alternatives. So how does the Chakun 4 stack up against its main rivals? Well, the GC quad is a better indoor unit. Hands down, its camera system reads spin and launch angles with more precision, and it doesn’t need as much space or lighting. You can actually get accurate results in rooms as short as 10 ft deep compared to the 16 ft you need for Trackman 4. So, that alone makes GC Quad far more practical for home golfers with limited space. Plus, it’s compatible with GS Pro, which opens up that bigger online community. Now outdoors it’s slightly weaker than Trackman 4, but unless you’re training almost exclusively outside, we would definitely lean GC Quad for the cleaner indoor performance. The Trackman IO is the new home sim contender from Trackman that’s ceiling mounted. It avoids a set of frustrations of Trackman 4. It gives you impact video, which is that slow motion replay of the club meeting the ball indoors. That’s a big advantage that the rear facing Trackman 4 can’t match. and the putting feels smoother since it’s an overhead angle tracking the roll more naturally. But the trade-off is clear. The IO is strictly indoors. If you need outdoor use, Trackcon 4 remains the fit. But if you’re 100% indoors, the IO is a simpler, cleaner choice. Both systems have that same visuals and software of Trackman. The real difference lies in where you’re going to use it. The IO will cost you 24495 right now to access all of the same indoor features as a Trackman 4. And it will also come with that $1,100 sub. So, who is the Trackman 4 actually built for? It’s not affordable for the average golfer. It was never meant to be, but for the right golfer, it will be a good match. Now, if you’re a coach, teaching professional, or fitter, Trackman 4, it’s going to give you that ability to explain every detail of the swing with objective proof. For tour level players, it means you can train any condition anywhere in the world with complete confidence in the data. Now, yes, there is an indoor only version of the Trackman 4, but for home golfers, even that option, it doesn’t make sense. If your setup is mainly simulator, indoor-based, you’re going to get more accuracy, an easier setup, just a cleaner experience if you go with a Trackman IO or the GC Quad. There is one exception, though. If your focus is outdoor practice, and you have a big budget, Trackman 4 is the best system that your money can buy. Now, that’s a tiny slice of casual players, but for them, nothing else is beating it right now. So, for the few who need everything it offers, it’s worth every penny. But for everyone else, the smarter choice is a unit designed around indoor golf. If you’re still unsure, try our launch monitor comparison tools on golfable.com or dive into our full Trackman 4 review which is linked below where we break down every feature. You can also watch our Trackman IO review video on our channel to see if that’s a fit for you. Thanks for watching and we’ll see you in the next one.
🇬🇧 Use code GOLFIBLE5 to get a 5% discount:
https://www.golfswingsystems.co.uk/product/trackman-indoor-launch-monitor/
🇺🇸 Buy the Trackman 4 Launch Monitor here:
https://www.trackman.com/golf/launch-monitors/trackman-4?aff=444&utm_source=affiliate&utm_medium=https://golfible.com/
——–
Updated Trackman 4 Review Article:
——–
=============================
Golfible Launch Monitor Tools
=============================
🔍 Our Filter Tool – Instantly filter by key features ➡️ https://golfible.com/launch-monitor-filter-tool/
📊 Our Compare Tool – View features side by side ➡️ https://golfible.com/launch-monitor-comparison/
🧠 Launch Monitor Quiz ➡️
——–
Trackman 4 is the gold standard for outdoor practice and coaching — the accuracy, depth of club and ball data, and world-class software make it a serious tool for elite players and fitters. Outdoors, it’s unbeatable. But indoors, it demands a lot: 16+ feet of space, ideal lighting, and expensive RCT balls just to get consistent spin numbers. At over $20K plus ongoing subscription fees, it’s hard to justify for home users when more practical, indoor-friendly options like the GCQuad or Trackman iO exist. If you’re a coach or training outdoors year-round, it’s incredible — but for everyone else, it’s probably overkill.
————-
⏰ Timestamps ⏰
0:00 Intro
0:22 Golfible.com tools
0:54 Where Does Trackman 4 Excel?
1:23 Minimum Space Requirements
1:43 Setup & Practical Realities
2:48 Data Depth
3:35 Putting Data Metrics
3:53 Software Features & Practice Tools
5:44 Trackman Games
6:18 Trackman 4 Pricing
6:51 Competitor Comparison
8:19 Who Is Trackman 4 Made For?
